by Amb. Nikki Haley to UN Security Council
December 18, 2017
Thank you, Mr. President. In this meeting, I will not use
Councilís time to address where a sovereign nation might decide to put its
embassy, and why we have every right to do so. I will address a more appropriate
and urgent concern.
This week marks the one-year anniversary of the passage of
Resolution 2334. On that day, in this Council, in December 2016, the United
States elected to abstain, allowing the measure to pass. Now itís one year and
a new administration later. Given the chance to vote again on Resolution 2334, I
can say with complete confidence that the United States would vote ďno.Ē We
would exercise our veto power. The reasons why are very relevant to the cause of
peace in the Middle East.
On the surface, Resolution 2334 described Israeli
settlements as impediments to peace. Reasonable people can disagree about that,
and in fact, over the years the United States has expressed criticism of Israeli
settlement policies many times.
But in truth, it was Resolution 2334 itself that was an
impediment to peace. This Security Council put the negotiations between Israelis
and the Palestinians further out of reach by injecting itself, yet again, in
between the two parties to the conflict. By misplacing the blame for the failure
of peace efforts squarely on the Israeli settlements, the resolution gave a pass
to Palestinian leaders who for many years rejected one peace proposal after
another. It also gave them encouragement to avoid negotiations in the future. It
refused to acknowledge the legacy of failed negotiations unrelated to
settlements. And the Council passed judgment on issues that must be decided in
direct negotiations between the parties.
If the United Nationsí history in the peace efforts
proves anything, it is that talking in New York cannot take the place of
face-to-face negotiations between the regional parties. It only sets back the
cause of peace, not advance it.
As if to make this very point, Resolution 2334 demanded a
halt to all Israeli settlement activity in East Jerusalem Ė even in the Jewish
Quarter of the Old City. This is something that no responsible person or country
would ever expect Israel would do. And in this way, Resolution 2334 did what
President Trumpís announcement on Jerusalem as the capital of Israel did not
do: It prejudged issues that should be left in final status negotiations.
Given the chance today, the United States would veto
Resolution 2334 for another reason. It gave new life to an ugly creation of the
Human Rights Council: the database of companies operating in Jewish communities.
This is an effort to create a blacklist, plain and simple. It is yet another
obstacle to a negotiated peace. It is a stain on Americaís conscience that we
gave the so-called BDS movement momentum by allowing the passage of Resolution
To the United Nationsí shame, this has been a
disproportionately hostile place for the Middle Eastís most enduring
The United States refuses to accept the double standard
that says we are not impartial when we stand by the will of the American people
by moving our U.S. embassy, but somehow the United Nations is a neutral party
when it consistently singles out Israel for condemnation.
For decades, Israel has withstood wave after wave of bias
in the UN and its agencies. The United States has often stood beside Israel. We
did not on December 23, 2016. We will not make that mistake again.
This week marks the one year anniversary of a significant
setback for Middle East peace. But the United States has an undiminished
commitment to helping bring about final status negotiations that will lead to
Our hand remains extended to both parties. We call on all
countries that share this commitment to learn the hard lessons of the past and
work to bring Israel and the Palestinian people in good faith to the peace