March 24, 2015
The Wall Street Journal rattled some teacups with
its article today claiming that Israel is spying on the American team
negotiating with Iran and sharing the results with lawmakers on Capitol Hill. It
should be noted that in the article itself Israeli officials deny that they were
spying on the U.S.; they say they got their information from spying on the
Iranians and from information freely shared with them by the French, who are
more interested in keeping the Israelis informed than the Americans are. Whether
the Israeli defense is true or not I don’t know. But either way there is
nothing particularly shocking going on here.
As a general matter, let us stipulate that allies should minimize the
extent to which they spy on each other, if only because such revelations can be
embarrassing and damaging. But the reality is that almost everyone does it. The
only notable exception I’m aware of is the “Five Eyes”—the U.S.,
Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada—which have been closely cooperating
in intelligence matters since World War II. The U.S. certainly spies on allies
such as France and Germany, as we discovered from Edward Snowden’s leaks.
And they spy on us.
For that matter the U.S. also spies on Israel. In fact it was through such
spying that the U.S. discovered the alleged Israeli spying. As the Journal
notes: “The White House discovered the [Israeli] operation, in fact, when U.S.
intelligence agencies spying on Israel intercepted communications among Israeli
officials that carried details the U.S. believed could have come only from
access to the confidential talks, officials briefed on the matter said.”
So U.S. officials are in no position to be pointing fingers at Israel. If
the Journal account is to be believed, the administration is less upset
by the Israeli espionage than by the Israelis sharing what they discovered with
legislators: “The espionage didn’t upset the White House as much as
Israel’s sharing of inside information with U.S. lawmakers and others to drain
support from a high-stakes deal intended to limit Iran’s nuclear program,
current and former officials said.”
Let me get this straight: The administration believes that it must at all
costs keep not only close allies such as Israel in the dark about the
negotiations but also lawmakers who have a duty to ratify treaties. The only
grounds I can see for the administration stance is that Obama is preparing to
reach a generous deal with Iran that he knows will upset lawmakers and allies,
and he is trying to keep the terms a secret until it is a fait accompli in the
hopes of ramming it through using executive prerogative alone. This is well
within the president’s power to do but it is hardly a wise way to proceed with
such a momentous agreement.
One suspects that the Israeli espionage may have leaked out now for the
same reason that the administration insists on pummeling Prime Minister
Netanyahu repeatedly in public: as a way to delegitimize the Israeli position
(which also happens to be the majority position of both houses of Congress) in
the Iran debate. This is a dangerous game that Obama is playing. At stake is
nothing less than Israel’s security as well as that of other American allies
located near Iran—to say nothing of US interests in the region.
Is Israel supposed to sit blind, deaf, and dumb while this is going on?
While it would be better if Israel didn’t feel compelled to spy on the U.S.
(just as it would be better if the US didn’t feel compelled to spy on Israel),
this is not an instance such as the Jonathan Pollard case, which was just stupid
spying, disrupting the alliance for no good reason. (Pollard was providing
“nice to have” information not “must have” information.) This is a
matter of survival for the Jewish State. So, while Netanyahu has made some
missteps in his dealing with Obama, such as challenging his negotiating position
before Congress, this is an instance where Israeli actions are understandable:
If the U.S. refuses to share what could be life or death information with
Israel, the Jewish State will get its information however it can. If it were put
in a similar position, the U.S. or any other nation would act in the same way.